Iraq and Libya were better off under the tyrants toppled by an arrogant and naive West

Do you agree? I am afraid I do. Living in Egypt you can see the affects on the people and most were better off before the Arab Spring….anyway read the artcile and see what you think.

STEPHEN GLOVER:  …………I’m afraid the bitter truth is Iraq and Libya were better off under the tyrants toppled by an arrogant and naive West | Mail Online: Cruel and despotic though he was, Saddam did offer Iraq a measure of stability, which was destroyed by the invasion. This repulsive strongman at least held his country together, which the divisive Shia-dominated government in Baghdad cannot do. More from Stephen Glover… STEPHEN GLOVER: I’m afraid the bitter truth is Iraq and Libya were better off under the tyrants toppled by an arrogant and naive West A similar point can be made about the no less repellent Gaddafi. In the Libya over which he presided for more than 40 years, there were no factions of militias killing innocent people and destroying their homes and livelihoods. Where would you prefer to try to live a half-normal life — in Gaddafi’s mostly peaceable Tripoli or in a city fought over by pitiless gunmen? Would it be better to inhabit Saddam Hussein’s Mosul or the city now transformed into a killing field by Islamic State? I know where my preferences would lie…………..